Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Goves's avatar

Great read as always - also agree with Jamie’s point.

On #11, this is where the interpretation of research matters. Sometimes it’s to really listen to children to shape what happens in school - which is great. Even better if the purpose IS healthy child development, civic reasoning, learning about yourself, others, the world through varied subject matter / lenses. Democratic, Rights Centred, affective neuroscience approaches - normalising systems (vs siloed) thinking. Also see the v good ‘Engaging Minds’ (Brent Davis et al) especially moments 3 and 4: https://amberroweblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/brent-davis-dennis-sumara-rebecca-luce-kapler-engaging-minds_-cultures-of-education-and-practices-of-teaching-routledge-2015.pdf

But mostly, sadly, the system doubles down on doing what it’s always done, defending itself with some new words eg we want students to be autonomous - they achieve that through success, so use explicit instruction to get competent (at structured tasks / tests). Or, if only kids understand why all this knowledge and tasks stuff are important, they’ll be motivated to do them…the tensions in finding a way to address the issues are clear, but feels like v little appetite for meaningful rebalancing eg this guidance…https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/ambition-institute/documents/Achieve_and_thrive_A_research-based_guide_to_pupil_motivation_and_engagement_S_OBg1rjY.pdf

Expand full comment
Leisa's avatar

As a Youth Work team leader much of this also resonated with me. Youth work has both been relegated to the bottom of the education pile and integrated into rigid risk averse systems.

We are also working in this poly crisis with less training and less investment and often with those young people who have been failed by the school system - and they can be angry with the world.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts